ESG performance and bank stability: the moderating role of board characteristics

Marchely Ng(1), Kusuma Indawati Halim(2*),

(1) Universitas Widya Dharma Pontianak
(2) Universitas Widya Dharma Pontianak
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study examines the effect of ESG performance on bank stability and tests whether the relationship is moderated by board independence and board gender diversity. This study uses a quantitative method with panel data on a sample of 39 commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2020-2024 with 195 observations of firms and years. Data were collected from annual reports and sustainability reports. The hypotheses were tested by panel regression analysis with board characteristics as moderating variables. The results reveal that ESG performance has a positive and significant impact on bank stability. Board independence has a positive direct effect on bank stability while board gender diversity has no significant direct effect. Nevertheless, both board independence and board gender diversity significantly strengthen the positive relationship between ESG performance and bank stability. The findings indicate that effective board governance plays a crucial role in enhancing the impact of ESG practices on bank stability. Additionally, this study adds to the literature on sustainable banking and corporate governance by demonstrating how board characteristics can strengthen the effectiveness of ESG implementation in enhancing bank stability. 


Keywords


ESG Performance; Bank Stability; Board Independence; Board Gender Diversity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alnabulsi, K., & Khemiri, M. A. (2025). The Moderating Role of Board Characteristics in the Relationship Between CSR and Bank Stability: Evidence from MENA Banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(11), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18110639

Amin, A., Mollah, S., Kamal, S., Zhao, Y., & Simsek, R. (2024). Independent directors’ connectedness and bank risk-taking. Journal of Financial Stability, 75, 101324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101324

Asare, N., Muah, P., Frimpong, G., & Anyass, I. A. (2022). Corporate board structures, financial performance and stability: Evidence from banking markets in Africa. Journal of Money and Business, 3(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-12-2021-0071

Aureli, S., Brighi, P., & Schadewitz, H. (2026). The impact of board diversity and sustainability engagement on bank performance. Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-026-09778-y

Bagh, T., Zhou, B., Alawi, S. M., & Azam, R. I. (2024). ESG resilience: Exploring the non-linear effects of ESG performance on firms sustainable growth. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102305

Batoun, F. A. S., & Mahmood, R. (2026). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Economic Growth. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(7), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19070480

Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Mendi, P. (2024). ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance. Eurasian Business Review, 14(1), 137–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00254-x

Chau, L., Anh, L., & Duc, V. (2025). Valuing ESG: How financial markets respond to corporate sustainability. International Business Review, 34(3), 102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102418

Dao, T. T. B., & Phan, M. C. (2023). Stakeholder theory, risk-taking and firm performance. Corporate Governance, 23(7), 1623–1647. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2022-0366

Elnahass, M., Alharbi, R., Mohamed, T. S., & McLaren, J. (2023). The Nexus among board diversity and bank stability: Implications from gender, nationality and education. Emerging Markets Review, 57, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101071

Emma, G.-M., Emiliano, R.-B., & Jennifer, M.-F. (2024). High-quality assurance, ESG legitimacy threats and board effectiveness. The British Accounting Review, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101385

Faizulayev, A. (2025). Empirical examination of ESG and fintech factors on financial sustainability: A comparative study of Islamic vs conventional banks in Islamic finance-oriented countries. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 11(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2024-0382

Gregory, R. P. (2025). Do ESG activities reduce agency costs? International Review of Economics & Finance, 104, 104780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104780

Habib, A., Oláh, J., Khan, M. H., & Luboš, S. (2025). Does integration of ESG disclosure and green financing improve firm performance: Practical applications of stakeholders theory. Heliyon, 11(4), e41996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41996

Halim, K. I. (2024). The Effect of Retention Rate, Debt to Equity Ratio, and Current Ratio on Company Sustainable Growth Rate. InFestasi, 20(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v20i2.27846

Ho, T. N. T., Nguyen, D., Le, T., Nguyen, H. T., & Tran, S. (2024). Does board gender diversity affect bank financial stability? Evidence from a transitional economy. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 40(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2023-0094

Hordofa, D. F., & Ionaşcu, A. E. (2025). Moderating effects of board gender diversity and size on bank profitablity: Panel evidence from Ethiopia. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01926-y

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Karkowska, R., & Acedański, J. (2020). The effect of corporate board attributes on bank stability. Portuguese Economic Journal, 19(2), 99–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-019-00162-3

Kolias, G., & Arnis, N. (2019). Analysing the profitability and the relations among its determinants of the retail sector: Evidence from Greece. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAT2018.0331

Kumar, I., & Sharma, S. K. (2026). Do Female Board Directors Contribute to Better Firm Performance? Exploring the Moderating Role of Firm Size. Global Business Review, 09721509261449567. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509261449567

Kusnadi, L. M. A. F., & Halim, K. I. (2026). Assessing Earnings Quality Using Accruals and Sustainability Metrics. JAS (Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah), 10(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.46367/jas.v10i1.2781

Leung, W. S., Song, W., & Chen, J. (2019). Does bank stakeholder orientation enhance financial stability? Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.01.003

Liaqat, I., Floreani, J., & Naseer, M. M. (2026). ESG performance and Bank stability: The role of national culture and formal institutions. Research in International Business and Finance, 81, 103214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103214

Milenia, V. V., & Halim, K. I. (2026). Do Related Party Transactions Affect Firm Value? KEUNIS, 14(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v14i1.6879

Mohammed Abubakr, A. A., Mahade, A., Musa, A. M. H., Hussin, Z. A. M., Ahmad, Z., & Abdalla, A. A. A. (2026). Impact of ESG Performance on Profitability and Firm Value: Experience of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Sage Open, 16(1), 21582440261416260. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261416260

Najaf, R., Najaf, K., Wahba, K., & Khlie, K. (2025). How Female Director Attributes Drive Governance and Firm Performance Through Critical Mass Theory. Business Strategy & Development, 8(4), e70248. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70248

Nguyen, Q. K., & Dang, V. C. (2022). The impact of risk governance structure on bank risk management effectiveness: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Heliyon, 8(10), e11192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11192

Owen, A. L., & Temesvary, J. (2018). The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.02.015

Salem, M. R. M., Shahimi, S., Alma‘amun, S., Hafizh Mohd Azam, A., & Ghazali, M. F. (2025). ESG and Banking Performance in ASEAN-5: Disaggregated Analysis Using System GMM and LSDVC. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251382564. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251382564

Sbai, H., & Ed-Dafali, S. (2023). Gender diversity and risk-taking: Evidence from dual banking systems. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(5), 1813–1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2022-0248

Sendi, A., Banna, H., Hassan, M. K., & Huq, T. I. (2024). The effect of ESG scores on bank stability: Islamic vs. conventional banks. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 0(0), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2395876

Tariq, W., Chen, Y., Tariq, A., & Torkkeli, M. (2024). Breaking the glass ceiling in banking: The impact of female directors, digitalization, and income diversification on financial stability. The Bottom Line, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2023-0234

Wang, Y., & Sonenshine, R. (2025). The Nonlinear Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance on Stock Market Performance Among US Manufacturing and Banking Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060293

Zheng, C., Murod, M., Khan, M. A. M., Rahman, M., Saha, T., & Zaman, A.-U.-. (2026). ESG Performance and Bank Risk-Taking in Developed and Developing Countries: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty. Sage Open, 16(1), 21582440261425935. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261425935




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/mabis.v25i3.1274

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Marchely Ng, Kusuma Indawati Halim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 1412-3789. e-ISSN: 2477-1783.

Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGARUDA - Garba Rujukan Digital
DOAJ
ROADROADEBSCO
mabis statistics