THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION ON THE SATISFACTION OF BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS

Devani Laksmi Indyastuti(1*),

(1) Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to examine the effect of violations of psychological contracts on satisfaction of basic psychological needs. Basic psychological needs consist of a sense of autonomy, competency and connectedness. Data were obtained from a sample of teachers and staff in schools in Purwokerto. The research method used a survey. The results showed that it is important for school administrators to pay attention to the employee psychological violations. Based on the research results showed that psychological contract breach effects the autonomy and connectedness of a person, but not the competence.

Keywords


Psychological contract, autonomy, competence, relatedness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2005. Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. 2008. Facilitating Optimal Motivation and Psychological Well-Being Across Life’s Domains. Canadian Psychology, 49,1, 14-23

Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. 2008. Not All Responses to Breach Are The Same: The Interconnection of Social Exchange and Psychological Contract Processes in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1079–1098.

Epitropaki, O. 2013. A Multi-level Investigationof Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Identification Through The Lens of Perceived Organizational Membership: Testing A Moderated–Mediated Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 65 –86

Gagne, M. & Deci, E.L. 2005. “Self Determination Theory and Work Motivation”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.

Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. 1997. When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. 2002. “Overview of Self Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective”. In E.L.Deci & Ryan, R.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self Determination Research (pp. 3-33). Rocherster, New York: The University of Rochester Press.

Robinson SL. 1996. Trust and Breach of The Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574-599.

Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. 2000. The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525–546.

Skinner ,E. & Edge, K. 2002. “Self Determination, Coping and Development”. In Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (Eds.). Handbook of Self Determination Reseach, The University of Rochester Press.

Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B. & Lens, Willy. 2010. “Capturing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness at Work: Construction and Initial Validation of The Work Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981-1002.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/jmb.v17i1.383

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Management and Business



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 1412-3789. e-ISSN: 2477-1783.

Google Scholar Google ScholarGARUDA - Garba Rujukan Digital
ROADROADDimensions
 mabis statistics