Easy and visible: accountability of the Gontor modern islamic boarding school

Riesanti Edie Wijaya(1*),

(1) Universitas Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Accountability is essential for all organizations, including faith-based organizations (FBOs). Stakeholders require accountability information to assess how management operates the organization. Since organizational accountability is shaped by culture and local wisdom, its form varies significantly across communities. This study explores accountability concepts within the financial management framework of Gontor Modern Islamic Boarding School (GMIBS). Adopting an interpretive paradigm, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with key informants—financial report preparers with comprehensive understanding of institutional financial reporting. Two additional informants obtained through snowball sampling enabled data triangulation. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the collected data. The findings reveal a unique accountability concept tailored to GMIBS's conditions and culture, built upon four principles: transparency, easy data access, openness, and globalization. These principles underlie financial reporting in two categories: vertical and downward accountability. Vertical accountability focuses on the Waqf Council; given members' relatively older age, reports are simplified for easier comprehension without requiring advanced software. Downward accountability addresses other stakeholders' needs, allowing them to directly observe and assess property improvements through their senses. This study demonstrates that accountability is socially constructed, and the unique accountability practices in GMIBS contribute to the literature on accountability in faith-based organizations.


Keywords


Accountability, Islamic boarding school, waqf, vertical, horizontal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agyemang, G. (2023). Let’s have a relook at accountability. The British Accounting Review, 101262.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. sage.

Basri, H., Nabiha, A. K., & Majid, M. (2016). Accounting and accountability in religious organizations: An islamic contemporary scholars’ perspective. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 18(2), 207.

Buanaputra, V. G., Astuti, D., & Sugiri, S. (2022). Accountability and legitimacy dynamics in an Islamic boarding school. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 553–570.

Bulycheva, T. V, Busheva, A. Y., Eliseeva, O. V, & Zavyalova, T. V. (2021). Innovative approach to accounting policy development in accordance with international financial reporting standards. In Сooperation and Sustainable Development (pp. 897–907). Springer.

Busuioc, M., & Lodge, M. (2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: Managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91–100.

Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Nguyen, D. K., Battisti, E., & Kaur, P. (2025). Exploring family values, religion, and ethical behavior in family businesses: A multi-stage qualitative investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(4), 865–891.

Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2017). The donor–beneficiary charity accountability paradox: A tale of two stakeholders. Public Money & Management, 37(3), 157–164.

Efe, I., & Ozer, O. (2023). Understanding the internationalization of Turkish higher education through discourse analysis. Journal of Studies in International Education, 27(3), 483–500.

Epstein, R. A., & Epstein, R. A. (2009). Simple rules for a complex world. Harvard University Press.

Flinders, M., Dimova, G., & Monaghan, C. (2025a). Accountability: A Concept with Adjectives. Understanding Accountability: New Perspectives on a Fractured World, 2.

Flinders, M., Dimova, G., & Monaghan, C. (2025b). Understanding Accountability: New Perspectives on a Fractured World. Routledge.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.

Frank, M. C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Using speakers’ referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Psychological Science, 20(5), 578–585.

Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). Accountability and extra-role behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(2), 131–144.

Handayani, N., Ludigdo, U., Rosidi, R., & Roekhudin, R. (2022). The concept of financial accountability in education system: Study on private own Islamic boarding school. GENERAL MANAGEMENT, 23.

Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 191–214.

Izmuddin, I., Amalia, E., Nasir, M. A., & Muttaqin, F. (2023). The Legitimation of Religion in Profit Seeking: The Role of National Shari ‘āh Division of The Indonesian Muslim Council (DSN-MUI).

Jayasinghe, K., & Soobaroyen, T. (2009). Religious “spirit” and peoples’ perceptions of accountability in Hindu and Buddhist religious organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Kecskes, I. (2017). Implicitness in the use of situation bound utterances. Implicitness, 201–215.

Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W. M., & Dana, L.-P. (2022). Religion as a social shaping force in entrepreneurship and business: Insights from a technology-empowered systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121393.

Migdal, J. S. (2018). The state in society. In New directions in comparative politics (pp. 63–79). Routledge.

Moore, D., Keane, H., Duncan, D., & Lenton, E. (2022). Handling complexity: Constituting the relationship between intoxication and violence in Australian alcohol policy discourse. In Routledge handbook of intoxicants and intoxication (pp. 484–498). Routledge.

Moran, V., Allen, P., Sanderson, M., McDermott, I., & Osipovic, D. (2021). Challenges of maintaining accountability in networks of health and care organisations: A study of developing Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships in the English National Health Service. Social Science & Medicine, 268, 113512.

Nahar, H. S., & Yaacob, H. (2011). Accountability in the sacred context: The case of management, accounting and reporting of a Malaysian cash awqaf institution. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(2), 87–113.

Nurtawab, E., & Wahyudi, D. (2022). Restructuring traditional Islamic education in Indonesia: Challenges for pesantren institution. Studia Islamika, 29(1), 55–81.

Raja Adnan, R. A. binti, Abdul Mutalib, M., & Ab Aziz, M. R. (2022). Factors necessary for effective corporate waqf management for Malaysian public healthcare. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(1), 73–88.

Rana, T., Bracci, E., Tallaki, M., & Ievoli, R. (2022). The doxa of accountability knowledge: A socioanalysis of accountability research in accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(4), 582–607.

Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

Samindjaya, S. S., Laallam, A., Hudaefi, F. A., Issa, B. M., Ouassaf, S., & Oussedik, M. I. (2024). Imam zarkasyi’s contribution to indonesia’s modern waqf education system. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 74–91.

Tsing, A. (2000). The global situation. Cultural Anthropology, 15(3), 327–360.

Wankhade, M., Rao, A. C. S., & Kulkarni, C. (2022). A survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7), 5731–5780.

Witvliet, C. V. O., Jang, S. J., Johnson, B. R., Evans, C. S., Berry, J. W., Torrance, A., Roberts, R. C., Peteet, J. R., Leman, J., & Bradshaw, M. (2023). Transcendent accountability: Construct and measurement of a virtue that connects religion, spirituality, and positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–14.

Zajda, J. (2022). Globalisation and Competitiveness-Driven Education Reforms for Academic Excellence and Standards. In Discourses of Globalisation, Ideology, Education and Policy Reforms (pp. 1–9). Springer.

Zhang, R. (2024). Faith at the forefront: An analysis of the contributions and dilemmas of faith-based organizations to global governance and human rights issues. In Addressing Global Challenges-Exploring Socio-Cultural Dynamics and Sustainable Solutions in a Changing World (pp. 71–77). Routledge.

Zoglauer, T. (2023). Constructed Truths: Truth and Knowledge in a Post-Truth World. Springer Nature.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/mabis.v25i1.1019

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Riesanti Edie Wijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 1412-3789. e-ISSN: 2477-1783.

Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGARUDA - Garba Rujukan Digital
DOAJ
ROADROADEBSCO
mabis statistics